Our Story
Built by People Who've Lived Through Breaches
LimitedView was not founded in a university lab or a VC accelerator. It was founded by security practitioners who spent fifteen years inside enterprise environments, responding to real incidents, and asking the same uncomfortable question: why does training keep failing?
Fifteen Years in the Making
Every product decision at LimitedView traces back to a practitioner experience — something the founding team saw, fixed, or failed at in a real organisation.
Solution Architecture at Scale
The founding team spent eight years designing enterprise security infrastructure across financial services, government, and critical national infrastructure — building the architectural foundations that would later inform their understanding of where training fails.
Security Architecture & Breach Response
Moving into security architecture, the founding team experienced data breaches firsthand — not as observers, but as the people responsible for containing them. That experience revealed a consistent pattern: organisations had trained their staff, yet staff still made the same errors under pressure.
LimitedView & the Incident-as-a-Service Category
Armed with fifteen years of practitioner experience and a clear hypothesis — that training timing, not training content, is the decisive variable — LimitedView was founded to create a new category: Incident-as-a-Service. Delivering training within 48 hours of a real-world incident, at the precise moment when retention is highest.
Timing, Not Content, Is the Problem
After analysing training outcomes across hundreds of organisations, the pattern was unambiguous: organisations that deployed training within 48 hours of a real incident saw knowledge retention rates of 73%. The industry average — for training delivered on a standard annual schedule — is 12%. The content was often identical. The timing was not.
This discovery reshaped everything. If the content is not the problem, then investing millions in new course libraries is misdirected. The competitive advantage lies in the infrastructure to deliver the right training at the right moment — automatically, within hours of an incident being identified, and at the scale required by modern enterprise environments.
What We Stand For
Three principles govern every product decision, every customer conversation, and every claim we publish.
Evidence-First
Every claim is backed by research across 847 organisations. We do not publish outcomes we cannot verify, and we do not make promises our data does not support.
Outcome-Focused
We measure behaviour change, not course completions. Completion rates are a vanity metric. Reduced repeat incidents are not.
Technology-Forward
Enterprise-grade infrastructure built for scale. Our AI analysis pipeline reduces incident-to-training time from weeks to 18.5 hours on average.
Join a Team That's Changing Security Culture
We are always interested in practitioners who are tired of watching training budgets disappear without changing behaviour.